On 20 March 2015, while FAA was
in the process of re-evaluating India's safety rating, I had written a post on
this same subject (WHAT
AILS INDIAN CIVIL AVIATION?). FAA has subsequently considered it
appropriate to upgrade India's rating to category 1. Now we have some disturbing
news from India that only goes to support my view that India, at this time,
does not deserve the Category 1 status! The news from India is as follows:
In my opinion, this incident in
which the crew are being hailed as “Hero’s” for this “Amazing Feat”, and Indian
DGCA’s lack of any reaction to it, represents everything that is wrong with
Indian Civil Aviation. The arguments I have heard in the social media are as
follows:
“Extreme circumstances require
Extreme Solutions.... Better than an assured and painful death...”
“So you mean that under those
conditions people should have been left to die... Please get real... No need to
be an Academic in the situation that was...”
“Rules do not apply in toto for a
Humanitarian Aid...”
“I
believe that at the end of the day... 240 Thankful Souls and Human lives have
been saved. Humanitarian consideration is supreme.”
“…calculated
risks. Today's aviation
is rule bound with no room for discretion. I am of the view that a bit
of room needs to be given for discretion…”
Well, the answer to these
arguments is that just like light is not absence of
darkness, but presence of energy,
safety is not absence of accidents, but presence of risk management. Principles
of basic aviation risk management must be followed always and every time. To
have an accident is not a crime but violation of standards is a crime!
“240
Thankful Souls and Human lives” were not saved in this flight, but lives of 240
unsuspecting innocent people were put to needless and avoidable risk! People
who were desperate. People who had no option but to trust the professionalism
and competence of the Indian Civil Aviation System to take them safe. People whose
trust and faith has been betrayed by that very same system in the end!
My
question is, if this flight had crashed, would we still be hailing this crew as
“Hero’s” or would we be screaming “Pilot Error” and asking for the Pilot’s head
to roll for overloading the aircraft? So, what message are we sending out
there? The message I am getting is that it is Ok to violate as long as you do
not have an accident! This is a very dangerous message, because once we set out
on this path, there is no knowing who will violate what, when and to what
extent! So, how many passengers more than the aircraft’s seating capacity are we
willing to accept in a flight? In this case, the flight was loaded to 60 more than
the seating capacity. So, if 60 is OK, is it also Ok to have 80 more? 180 more?
1,000 more? Where will we draw a line? Who will decide? On what basis will this
decision be made?
The
logic of putting lives of 240 people at risk to save 60 (who will also be
included in this body count) escapes me! The basic mantra of Safety Risk Management
cannot be overstated…while having an accident is not a crime; violation of
standards is a crime…Always, and every time.
https://www.createspace.com/4583791 |
To understand the full implications of this incident, we
need to go a bit deeper into how human minds work. I had also touched on this
subject in the last chapter of my book “Waiting…To Happen!” and this
will also be the prime subject matter of my next book that is, at this time,
under production. However, to elaborate very briefly, humans are very adaptable.
It is this trait of adaptability that has been one of the major factors in our
survival as a race. A flip side of this adaptability is that we also adapt,
very quickly, to risks in our environment and stop perceiving them as threats.
An example can be found in driving a car. Initially, one may feel afraid to
cross, say 40 Km/hr. speed. Nevertheless, one trip on the highway, driving at
60 or 80, and we stop seeing 40 as a risk any more. Then we quickly adapt to 60,
80, 120 or even more! In addition, humans are motivated by, among other
factors, a “Need for Professional or Social recognition”. Seeing someone recognized/rewarded
for an act motivates us to follow in that persons footsteps and do something similar.
On the other hand, seeing someone punished or shunned for an action motivates
us to avoid putting ourselves in the same situation. This is the basic theory on
which “Carrot and Stick” policy works to modify human behavior and maintain discipline
in an organization while also creating an “Organizational Culture”.
Now,
put these two concepts together. By recognizing the crews action (of
overloading aircraft by 60 passengers more than the aircraft’s seating
capacity) as an act of bravery, we are sending a message that it is more
important to help someone than to follow correct procedures. The further
message that goes across is that it is OK to violate safety standards and
regulations to help someone. Now, a young and aspiring crew-member would latch
on to this message very, very quickly. This will put them on a path where, in
the end, there will be no control over who will violate what, when and to what
extent! As long as they themselves feel justified, they would go ahead and
violate…and while in this case the crew got away with the violation without an
accident, the same will not be true every time or in every situation…and we
will be left wondering, why did someone so well trained and experienced do
something so stupid? The answer is simple. They did something so stupid because
we set a precedence by recognizing and rewarding someone else’s violation
instead of nipping the problem in the bud by strong action to send a message
that INTENTIONAL violation of
standards, and negligence, are never acceptable, whatever the circumstances!
This is what is called an “Exceptional Violation” and in the chart below, an
exceptional violation that amounts to negligence, is the ONLY violation that warrants
a punishment.
So, PLEASE WAKE-UP INDIA! By praising
this action and by not taking strong action to nip this in the bud, you are on
a path whose end will only be in destruction and disaster!
Stay Safe,
The Erring Human.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Kindly refrain from posting obscenity or advertisements. Users posting inappropriate or unrelated comments will be blacklisted from further postings. Thank you for your understanding and for maintaining the professionalism of this blog.